The underlying assumption in CGâs move is that the wave of money behind it is highly likely to come. Maybe this is a dumb question, but what gives them such a high level of confidence? It seems relevant to the discussion.
As someone privy to only a small fraction of it, I suspect there is a large quantity of private information that leads those in the know to conclude that a lot of philanthropic dollars are coming, including to global health and development.
The underlying assumption in CGâs move is that the wave of money behind it is highly likely to come. Maybe this is a dumb question, but what gives them such a high level of confidence? It seems relevant to the discussion.
As someone privy to only a small fraction of it, I suspect there is a large quantity of private information that leads those in the know to conclude that a lot of philanthropic dollars are coming, including to global health and development.