This was a really neat write up. As someone trying to do research myself (without much experience) I found it useful and I might take you up on the offer to help one day.
My intuition is that addressing the harms themselves is a more effective approach (i.e. violence and ceased education), but it is just an intuition.
There is a typo here: “The adjusted risk ratio was 0.09 (81% decreased chance)...” should be 91% - an effect size that would be amazing if true, but does seem unlikely unfortunately.
Hi Scott, great to hear from someone else doing research without much experience. Would be great to bounce ideas off each other and review each other’s work in future. My email is catherinefist@gmail.com :)
Yes that is also my intuition at this stage, as the negative outcomes of child marriage also occur outside of that context and we would want to address the whole problem, not just where it occurs within child marriage.
Thanks for the typo pick up! I have edited the post.
This was a really neat write up. As someone trying to do research myself (without much experience) I found it useful and I might take you up on the offer to help one day.
My intuition is that addressing the harms themselves is a more effective approach (i.e. violence and ceased education), but it is just an intuition.
There is a typo here: “The adjusted risk ratio was 0.09 (81% decreased chance)...” should be 91% - an effect size that would be amazing if true, but does seem unlikely unfortunately.
Hi Scott, great to hear from someone else doing research without much experience. Would be great to bounce ideas off each other and review each other’s work in future. My email is catherinefist@gmail.com :)
Yes that is also my intuition at this stage, as the negative outcomes of child marriage also occur outside of that context and we would want to address the whole problem, not just where it occurs within child marriage.
Thanks for the typo pick up! I have edited the post.