Do you have ideas for cost-effectively moving funding from the best interventions helping humans to the best ones helping animals? Relatedly, do you think the following increase, even if not cost-effectively, the funding going to the best interventions to help animals?
Arguing the best interventions to help animals are much more cost-effective than the best to help humans.
Discussing the meat-eater problem. I have heard this may decrease support for animal welfare by associating it with the controversial view that saving human lives may be bad due to increasing animal suffering.
Do you have ideas for cost-effectively moving funding from the best interventions helping humans to the best ones helping animals? Relatedly, do you think the following increase, even if not cost-effectively, the funding going to the best interventions to help animals?
Arguing the best interventions to help animals are much more cost-effective than the best to help humans.
Discussing the meat-eater problem. I have heard this may decrease support for animal welfare by associating it with the controversial view that saving human lives may be bad due to increasing animal suffering.