It seems obvious to me that numerous stakeholdersâincluding organization leaders, donors of all sizes, group leaders, and entrepreneursâwould all benefit from having an accurate understanding of EAâs growth trajectory. And it seems just as obvious that it would be tremendously inefficient for each of those parties to conduct their own analysis. It would be in everyoneâs interest to receive a regular (every 3-6 months?) update from a reliable analyst. This wouldnât be expensive (it wouldnât require anything close to a full-time job initially, though the frequency and/âor depth of the analyses could be scaled up if people saw value in doing so). As public goods go, this should be an easy one to provide.
Quick vibe-check from Rethink Priorities: Could people react with Agree or Disagree if you think EA Infrastructure Fund (as an example) paying for the Surveys & Data Analysis team of Rethink Priorities to do this (say, for a trial period of one year), would be money well spent?
I understand it depends on scope and price, but as a general direction this information would be useful. We agree this seems important, have done similar work before for other organizations, and would be happy to take on such a project.
Quick vibe-check from Rethink Priorities: Could people react with Agree or Disagree if you think EA Infrastructure Fund (as an example) paying for the Surveys & Data Analysis team of Rethink Priorities to do this (say, for a trial period of one year), would be money well spent?
I understand it depends on scope and price, but as a general direction this information would be useful. We agree this seems important, have done similar work before for other organizations, and would be happy to take on such a project.