Scopus says Singer has >600 co-authors, and I think that’s only in academic publications. Claim (47) seems surprising.[1] [Edit: it’s actually 77, see Pablo’s comment below.]
And Claim (46) seems plausible but uninteresting, given that “Scholars of the American movement find that [nonhuman animal rights] activists are overwhelmingly women at about 80 per cent (Gaarder 2011).”
Dawn claims:
Scopus says Singer has >600 co-authors, and I think that’s only in academic publications. Claim (47) seems surprising.[1] [Edit: it’s actually 77, see Pablo’s comment below.]
I don’t know what “period relevant to this case” means, but I think hundreds of co-authors would be included if they mean 2002-2020.
Note that this is a different Peter Singer. Here is the entry for the relevant Peter Singer. According to it, Singer had 77 co-authors.
Oops, good correction, thanks!
And Claim (46) seems plausible but uninteresting, given that “Scholars of the American movement find that [nonhuman animal rights] activists are overwhelmingly women at about 80 per cent (Gaarder 2011).”