Because someone else backed off needlessly instead of properly addressing this, let me tell you in no uncertain terms; this is disqualifying wrong. AI art is not only highly reduced in quality, it concentrates power in whomever owns the AI model. It’s just ownership transfer through intellectual property theft, to the capital class who charges you a subscription for access to the model. That you can get a free taste is an advertisement, not a rebuttal of the economic model.
If the EA movement is not 100% agreed that AI art represents an example of centralization of power you cannot be trusted with shepherding AI. The intellectual gap is too large to reasonably bridge; the community is rotten and beyond saving, acting merely as a tool to further AI misalignment.
Because someone else backed off needlessly instead of properly addressing this, let me tell you in no uncertain terms; this is disqualifying wrong. AI art is not only highly reduced in quality, it concentrates power in whomever owns the AI model. It’s just ownership transfer through intellectual property theft, to the capital class who charges you a subscription for access to the model. That you can get a free taste is an advertisement, not a rebuttal of the economic model.
If the EA movement is not 100% agreed that AI art represents an example of centralization of power you cannot be trusted with shepherding AI. The intellectual gap is too large to reasonably bridge; the community is rotten and beyond saving, acting merely as a tool to further AI misalignment.