Instead of what you are suggesting in this ellipsis, it seems like a reasonable first pass perspective is given directly by the interview you quoted from. I think omitting this is unreasonable.
To be clear, you’re using the linguistic sense of ‘ellipsis’, and not the punctuation mark?
Yes, that is correct, I am using the linguistic sense, similar to “implication” or “suggestion”.
To be clear, you’re using the linguistic sense of ‘ellipsis’, and not the punctuation mark?
Yes, that is correct, I am using the linguistic sense, similar to “implication” or “suggestion”.