Agree that having Torres on the paper changes how I’d interpret Cremer’s post about this paper, but I disagree that it was “deceptive” for them to exclude Torres’s name given they were allegedly forced to do so.
Torres alleges that Cremer and Kemp were forced to remove them from the paper (which I don’t trust for obvious reasons), but even granting that, that doesn’t mean Cremer and Kemp were forced to never mention the fact that Torres was originally a co-author. I basically can’t believe they were “forced” to keep it a secret that Torres was ever involved.
Or even asked! That wouldn’t even make sense for supposedly-censorious “EA elites” to do. If I were a censorious EA elite I would want people to know about Torres’s involvement in the paper.
Agree that having Torres on the paper changes how I’d interpret Cremer’s post about this paper, but I disagree that it was “deceptive” for them to exclude Torres’s name given they were allegedly forced to do so.
Torres alleges that Cremer and Kemp were forced to remove them from the paper (which I don’t trust for obvious reasons), but even granting that, that doesn’t mean Cremer and Kemp were forced to never mention the fact that Torres was originally a co-author. I basically can’t believe they were “forced” to keep it a secret that Torres was ever involved.
Or even asked! That wouldn’t even make sense for supposedly-censorious “EA elites” to do. If I were a censorious EA elite I would want people to know about Torres’s involvement in the paper.