Personally I don’t believe in a “trusted person”, as a concept. I think EA has had its fun trying to be a high trust environment where some large things are kept private, and it backfired horribly.
I’ll take <agree> <disagree> votes to indicate how compelling this would be to readers.
That was the aim of my comment as well, so I do hope more people actually vote on it.
Personally I don’t believe in a “trusted person”, as a concept. I think EA has had its fun trying to be a high trust environment where some large things are kept private, and it backfired horribly.
That was the aim of my comment as well, so I do hope more people actually vote on it.
I think a reasonably independent reviewer who is not perfectly trustworthy would still be better than no reviewer at all.