My guess is that “describes actions an organization is taking” (as opposed to “actions someone thinks an organization should take”) is a relatively objective categorization, and I feel reasonably optimistic about our ability to accurately apply these tags.
That being said, there are a bunch of ways to slice this ontology, and I’m worried we might get a proliferation of exceptions to the rule which will end up making me think that we should stick with the simple “community: yes/no”.
My guess is that “describes actions an organization is taking” (as opposed to “actions someone thinks an organization should take”) is a relatively objective categorization, and I feel reasonably optimistic about our ability to accurately apply these tags.
That being said, there are a bunch of ways to slice this ontology, and I’m worried we might get a proliferation of exceptions to the rule which will end up making me think that we should stick with the simple “community: yes/no”.
Makes sense!