I don’t follow the argument that only one funder implies little RFMF:
I agree with gwern that it is concerning that the small number of Open Science orgs are mostly all funded by LJAF, despite the general awareness of the problems. For our purposes, this probably means that OS has little RFMF right now, because the opportunities are already filled by LJAF.
Could you say more about this?
I think Catherio’s response to Gwern on that LessWrong thread is also worth reading. The gist is that the replication effort was already underway but unfunded when Arnold decided to fund it. So if you’re looking for things to help with funding, you might want to ask around about other attempts within a high-value profession to coordinate around better standards.
Thanks for doing this!
I don’t follow the argument that only one funder implies little RFMF:
Could you say more about this?
I think Catherio’s response to Gwern on that LessWrong thread is also worth reading. The gist is that the replication effort was already underway but unfunded when Arnold decided to fund it. So if you’re looking for things to help with funding, you might want to ask around about other attempts within a high-value profession to coordinate around better standards.