Yeah that was in process but I’m not sure what the timeline on it is. We generally use “EV” to refer to the thing your diagrams are pointing to, though EV is not an organisation in itself — just an umbrella term for the two distinct entities. Thanks!
Would redoing the diagrams and text with “EV” instead of “EVF” be better?
(Personally I like “EVF” better, mostly because three-letter acronyms have fewer conflicts, but if the umbrella org wants to go by “EV” I’m happy to help)
I’m confused: Announcing Interim CEOs of EVF consistently uses “EVF”, including in phrases like “80k, one of the largest EVF projects”. Should I switch these diagrams back to say “EVF”?
(I raised this when the other post came out, but no response.)
Yeah that was in process but I’m not sure what the timeline on it is. We generally use “EV” to refer to the thing your diagrams are pointing to, though EV is not an organisation in itself — just an umbrella term for the two distinct entities. Thanks!
Would redoing the diagrams and text with “EV” instead of “EVF” be better?
(Personally I like “EVF” better, mostly because three-letter acronyms have fewer conflicts, but if the umbrella org wants to go by “EV” I’m happy to help)
Yeah that’d be great. Thanks!
I’m confused: Announcing Interim CEOs of EVF consistently uses “EVF”, including in phrases like “80k, one of the largest EVF projects”. Should I switch these diagrams back to say “EVF”?
(I raised this when the other post came out, but no response.)
edited!