I think you present some really important ideas here but it’s hard to engage with them properly. You could change that by increasing the reasoning transparency of your claims.
If you have the energy, try stating the risks you are describing more clearly and also say how likely you think they are e.g. “human infertility may be an x-risk under some assumptions, even though it seems unlikely on others” “I think there is a ~5% chance biodiversity loss will be an existential risk” This way we may be able to have a more fruitful discussion.
I think you present some really important ideas here but it’s hard to engage with them properly. You could change that by increasing the reasoning transparency of your claims.
If you have the energy, try stating the risks you are describing more clearly and also say how likely you think they are e.g. “human infertility may be an x-risk under some assumptions, even though it seems unlikely on others” “I think there is a ~5% chance biodiversity loss will be an existential risk”
This way we may be able to have a more fruitful discussion.