So from the perspective of the recruiting party these reasons make sense. From the perspective of a critical outsider, these very same reasons can look bad (and are genuine reasons to mistrust the group that is recruiting): - easier to manipulate their trajectory - easier to exploit their labour - free selection, build on top of/continue rich get richer effects of ‘talented’ people - let’s apply a supervised learning approach to high impact people acquisition, the training data biases won’t affect it
Well, haters are gonna hate. Maybe that’s too blase, but as long as we are talking about university groups rather than high schools, the PR risks don’t feel too substantial.
So from the perspective of the recruiting party these reasons make sense. From the perspective of a critical outsider, these very same reasons can look bad (and are genuine reasons to mistrust the group that is recruiting):
- easier to manipulate
their trajectory- easier to exploit their labour
- free selection, build on top of/continue rich get richer effects of ‘talented’ people
- let’s apply a supervised learning approach to high impact people acquisition, the training data biases won’t affect it
Well, haters are gonna hate. Maybe that’s too blase, but as long as we are talking about university groups rather than high schools, the PR risks don’t feel too substantial.