I think she is suggesting that only reading up about one person’s thoughts and treating it like gospel is cult-like and bad, then sharing that singular view gives off cult-like impressions (understandably). Rather, being more open to learning many different people’s views, forming your own nuanced opinion, and then sharing that is far more valuable both intrinsically and extrinsically!
I think it’s pretty clear you shouldn’t be saying “some well-respected figures think X because Y” regardless, that’s like 101 bad epistemics because it’s not referencable and vague.
I think she is suggesting that only reading up about one person’s thoughts and treating it like gospel is cult-like and bad, then sharing that singular view gives off cult-like impressions (understandably). Rather, being more open to learning many different people’s views, forming your own nuanced opinion, and then sharing that is far more valuable both intrinsically and extrinsically!
I think it’s pretty clear you shouldn’t be saying “some well-respected figures think X because Y” regardless, that’s like 101 bad epistemics because it’s not referencable and vague.