I’m interested in what multi-agent dynamics mean for an ASI political ecology, and what the fact that ASI agents will need to learn negotiation, compromise and cooperation (as well as Machiavellian strategising) means for human flourishing/survival. I’d like to believe that multi-agent dynamics means humanity might be more likely to be incorporated into the future, but that might just be cope. Thanks for the link, look forward to reading it.
Hi, I’m not sure if I failed to read your post before submitting my own or if it was just good timing.
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/pis8bviKY25RFog92/what-does-an-asi-political-ecology-mean-for-human-survival
I’m interested in what multi-agent dynamics mean for an ASI political ecology, and what the fact that ASI agents will need to learn negotiation, compromise and cooperation (as well as Machiavellian strategising) means for human flourishing/survival. I’d like to believe that multi-agent dynamics means humanity might be more likely to be incorporated into the future, but that might just be cope. Thanks for the link, look forward to reading it.
For context I’m thinking of the paradox of the plankton..
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_the_plankton