Do you see EAs taking Ămile seriously? Ămile is banned from the forum, and I would guess most people who know the name at all know it as the name of someone who has been persistently unreasonable in their criticisms.
(btw though, your comment says âhe shouldnât be taken seriouslyâ, but Ămile is a they, not a he)
Hi Ben! I suppose it depends on what each of us means by âtaken seriouslyâ. I would prefer a post like this didnât get 185 karma, because I want us to collectively agree to make Ămile irrelevant.
Do you see EAs taking Ămile seriously? Ămile is banned from the forum, and I would guess most people who know the name at all know it as the name of someone who has been persistently unreasonable in their criticisms.
(btw though, your comment says âhe shouldnât be taken seriouslyâ, but Ămile is a they, not a he)
Hi Ben! I suppose it depends on what each of us means by âtaken seriouslyâ. I would prefer a post like this didnât get 185 karma, because I want us to collectively agree to make Ămile irrelevant.
Unfortunately, thatâs not a viable strategy. Emile is often the source for articles on EA in the media. Here are three examples from the guardian.