What exactly is the change you’d like to see? Stopping saying that working on x-risk/longtermism is important, or still saying that but nevertheless being more encouraging about other areas?
The latter. I very much believe they should do what they think right. Nevertheless, I feel like some changes to their wording and the (visual) representation of other cause areas might be a good idea, especially given their huge influence overall, not just in longtermism. Would be a tough balance to be sure, but not impossible imo.
The latter. I very much believe they should do what they think right. Nevertheless, I feel like some changes to their wording and the (visual) representation of other cause areas might be a good idea, especially given their huge influence overall, not just in longtermism. Would be a tough balance to be sure, but not impossible imo.