I don’t see how it necessarily implies that. Maybe “long-termist-EA” and “non-long-termist-EA”?
Global Health and Wellbeing is not too bad (even considering my quibbles with this). The “wellbeing” part could encompass animal welfare
… and even encompass avoiding global disasters ‘for the sake of the people who would suffer’, rather than ‘for the sake of extinction and potential future large civilizations’ etc.
(Added): But I guess GH&W may be too broad in the other direction. Don’t LT-ists also prioritize global well-being?
I don’t see how it necessarily implies that. Maybe “long-termist-EA” and “non-long-termist-EA”?
Global Health and Wellbeing is not too bad (even considering my quibbles with this). The “wellbeing” part could encompass animal welfare … and even encompass avoiding global disasters ‘for the sake of the people who would suffer’, rather than ‘for the sake of extinction and potential future large civilizations’ etc.
(Added): But I guess GH&W may be too broad in the other direction. Don’t LT-ists also prioritize global well-being?