I see your point but I don’t think the non-Ltists/neartermists actually do identify as a group along those lines (I may be wrong here). So for me, just “non-LTist EA” seems the right descriptor.
Although “Global Health and Wellbeing” (or maybe just “Global Wellbeing”) seem pretty decent.
I could see “Non-LTist EA” as the term to use for precision, and then also identify people by the cause, approach, or moral philosophy they care most about.
I see your point but I don’t think the non-Ltists/neartermists actually do identify as a group along those lines (I may be wrong here). So for me, just “non-LTist EA” seems the right descriptor.
Although “Global Health and Wellbeing” (or maybe just “Global Wellbeing”) seem pretty decent.
I could see “Non-LTist EA” as the term to use for precision, and then also identify people by the cause, approach, or moral philosophy they care most about.