Hey Harrison, thanks for the feedback (I’m one of the cofounders). I completely agree that our launch newsletter was a thin rebuttal of neoliberalism. We felt there’s enough ink & pixels spilled on the subject; we’re much more interested in the conversation around raising the profile of alternative policy options than yet another substantive critique. We do point to three works in there that we find useful in mounting a stronger critique (1, 2, 3).
That all being said, one of our main focus areas moving forward is building an interface for user contribution, so no matter our own biases or epistemics, LEP can field and provide a wider scope of information.
Hey Harrison, thanks for the feedback (I’m one of the cofounders). I completely agree that our launch newsletter was a thin rebuttal of neoliberalism. We felt there’s enough ink & pixels spilled on the subject; we’re much more interested in the conversation around raising the profile of alternative policy options than yet another substantive critique. We do point to three works in there that we find useful in mounting a stronger critique (1, 2, 3).
That all being said, one of our main focus areas moving forward is building an interface for user contribution, so no matter our own biases or epistemics, LEP can field and provide a wider scope of information.