Regarding clarity on gaps, what sort of work would you envision? Is methodology here something like going through all of CG’s accepted vs. rejected grants, and trying to identify patterns in what is/is not funded by institutions more broadly?
Curious to hear if you have thoughts regarding how we can get more people into AI biosecurity grantmaking specfically, given it’s such a new + small/niche field?
Thank you so much for your comment!
Regarding clarity on gaps, what sort of work would you envision? Is methodology here something like going through all of CG’s accepted vs. rejected grants, and trying to identify patterns in what is/is not funded by institutions more broadly?
I think one major gap here is c4s, have written more on this in a recent piece re: “stop donating to AI safety research”
Curious to hear if you have thoughts regarding how we can get more people into AI biosecurity grantmaking specfically, given it’s such a new + small/niche field?