On your specific question, the raising of OP’s GHW cost-effectiveness bar did not affect animal welfare interventions.
In this case:
How does OP decide on the amount of funding to allocate to farm animal welfare? If it is set to a given fraction of the total funding, how does OP decide on this fraction?
Does OP’s farm animal welfare area have other explicit cost-effectiveness bar?
Side note. OP’s GHW portfolio includes the focus area farm animal welfare. If interventions in this area are not affected by OP’s GHW bar, I think it would be better to say in posts like the one I linked above that the bar being discussed only applies to human welfare interventions. Maybe OP could call it OP’s GHW human welfare bar.
Thanks, Lewis!
In this case:
How does OP decide on the amount of funding to allocate to farm animal welfare? If it is set to a given fraction of the total funding, how does OP decide on this fraction?
Does OP’s farm animal welfare area have other explicit cost-effectiveness bar?
Side note. OP’s GHW portfolio includes the focus area farm animal welfare. If interventions in this area are not affected by OP’s GHW bar, I think it would be better to say in posts like the one I linked above that the bar being discussed only applies to human welfare interventions. Maybe OP could call it OP’s GHW human welfare bar.