All four of the estimates you review appear to be (at least loosely) EA-affiliated. Were those the only ones you could find that satisfied your criteria? What were your criteria when deciding which estimates to review?
I’m only aware of (loosely) EA affiliated attempts to assess the cost effectiveness of climate change versus global health. I knew about the “2016 GWWC estimate” before I started work on this writeup, and I had seen the “2019 Hillebrandt Cost-Effectiveness” estimate posted on this forum very recently. I found “2018 Halstead Extinction Risk” and “2019 Bressler Mortality Estimate” by searching on this forum.
Let me know if you’re aware of any other relevant estimates.
Thanks for writing this up!
All four of the estimates you review appear to be (at least loosely) EA-affiliated. Were those the only ones you could find that satisfied your criteria? What were your criteria when deciding which estimates to review?
I’m only aware of (loosely) EA affiliated attempts to assess the cost effectiveness of climate change versus global health. I knew about the “2016 GWWC estimate” before I started work on this writeup, and I had seen the “2019 Hillebrandt Cost-Effectiveness” estimate posted on this forum very recently. I found “2018 Halstead Extinction Risk” and “2019 Bressler Mortality Estimate” by searching on this forum.
Let me know if you’re aware of any other relevant estimates.
Ahh, if you’re specifically looking for comparisons to global health, that makes sense that they’re all EA-affiliated.