I saw on your page that you have a book on criminal justice reform, and this is also an area Open Phil works in.
Maybe this is asking a bit much for an AMA in case you aren’t already very familiar with their work, but I’ll go ahead anyway:
Do you have any major points of disagreement with Open Phil’s work in this area?
Are there any particular interventions you think Open Phil should fund but haven’t?
Are there any particular grants Open Phil has made that you think stand out as exceptionally good?
More generally, what is your impression of their grant-making in this area?
These are great questions. I’ll need to look into this more and come back to you.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I saw on your page that you have a book on criminal justice reform, and this is also an area Open Phil works in.
Maybe this is asking a bit much for an AMA in case you aren’t already very familiar with their work, but I’ll go ahead anyway:
Do you have any major points of disagreement with Open Phil’s work in this area?
Are there any particular interventions you think Open Phil should fund but haven’t?
Are there any particular grants Open Phil has made that you think stand out as exceptionally good?
More generally, what is your impression of their grant-making in this area?
These are great questions. I’ll need to look into this more and come back to you.