FWIW I had assumed the former was the case. Thank you for clarifying.I had assumed the former as
it felt like the logical reading of the phrasing of the above
my read of the things funded in this round seemed to be that some of them don’t appear to be b OR c (unless b and c are interpreted very broadly).
FWIW I had assumed the former was the case. Thank you for clarifying.
I had assumed the former as
it felt like the logical reading of the phrasing of the above
my read of the things funded in this round seemed to be that some of them don’t appear to be b OR c (unless b and c are interpreted very broadly).