Would you consider breaking down your questions into sub-(sub-sub-...) questions that readers can answer and coordinating the discourse? I made a (fun) synthesis sheet for 216 participants (1 central EA-related question broken down into 3 layers of 6 questions). For each end-question, I included a resource which I vetted for EA-related thinking stimulation and (some) idea non-repetition. Feel free to also review a rough draft of breaking down the questions that you introduce in this piece.
I would argue that any intro to EA fellowship participant who was not discouraged from involvement can answer these questions. First, the broader ones should be skimmed and then the end-one selected.
This would result in efficient thought development, defining exclusivity by participation.
Would you consider breaking down your questions into sub-(sub-sub-...) questions that readers can answer and coordinating the discourse? I made a (fun) synthesis sheet for 216 participants (1 central EA-related question broken down into 3 layers of 6 questions). For each end-question, I included a resource which I vetted for EA-related thinking stimulation and (some) idea non-repetition. Feel free to also review a rough draft of breaking down the questions that you introduce in this piece.
I would argue that any intro to EA fellowship participant who was not discouraged from involvement can answer these questions. First, the broader ones should be skimmed and then the end-one selected.
This would result in efficient thought development, defining exclusivity by participation.