I’m unsure where the balance should lie quantitatively. I think that $100 million would probably be too much, and $10 million is probably too low.
I agree that x-risk work doesn’t fit nicely into this: it’s not even clear whether you’d want to count the output of research as “actually” what you want or as VoI.
I’m unsure where the balance should lie quantitatively. I think that $100 million would probably be too much, and $10 million is probably too low.
I agree that x-risk work doesn’t fit nicely into this: it’s not even clear whether you’d want to count the output of research as “actually” what you want or as VoI.