I didnāt actually interpret Larkās post as trying to contribute to the āongoing prosecution-and-defence of Robinās character or workā, but instead think it is trying to add to the cancel culture conversation more generally, using Robinās case as a useful example.
Sorry, this is on me. The original draft of that sentence read something like āI agree with Khorton below that little is being served by an ongoing prosecution-and-defence of Robinās character or work, so Iām not going to weigh in again on those specific points and request others replying to this comment do the same, instead focusing on the question of what rules we do/ādonāt want in generalā.
I then cut the sentence down, but missed that in doing so it could now be read as implying that this was Larksā objective. That wasnāt intentional, and I donāt think this.
Thanks for your response.
Sorry, this is on me. The original draft of that sentence read something like āI agree with Khorton below that little is being served by an ongoing prosecution-and-defence of Robinās character or work, so Iām not going to weigh in again on those specific points and request others replying to this comment do the same, instead focusing on the question of what rules we do/ādonāt want in generalā.
I then cut the sentence down, but missed that in doing so it could now be read as implying that this was Larksā objective. That wasnāt intentional, and I donāt think this.