These are just the first questions that came to mind, but may not necessarily overlap with Adreas’ interests or knowledge:
Given his deontological leanings, is there something he would like to see people in the EA community doing less/more of?
What’s the paper/line of investigation from GPI that has changed his view on practical priorities for EA the most?
How involved in philosophical discussions should the median EA be? (e.g. should we all read Parfit or just muddle through with what we hear from informal discussions of ethics within the community?)
What’s the thrust of his argument in “Against Large Number Sceptism”? How would he characterize how people who feel uncomfortable with arguments resting on large numbers think about the subject?
Where does the interest in Decision Theroy among EAs come from? Is it because it could have practical implications or something else entirely? What would change if we had an answer to the top open questions in Decision Theory?
These are just the first questions that came to mind, but may not necessarily overlap with Adreas’ interests or knowledge:
Given his deontological leanings, is there something he would like to see people in the EA community doing less/more of?
What’s the paper/line of investigation from GPI that has changed his view on practical priorities for EA the most?
How involved in philosophical discussions should the median EA be? (e.g. should we all read Parfit or just muddle through with what we hear from informal discussions of ethics within the community?)
What’s the thrust of his argument in “Against Large Number Sceptism”? How would he characterize how people who feel uncomfortable with arguments resting on large numbers think about the subject?
Where does the interest in Decision Theroy among EAs come from? Is it because it could have practical implications or something else entirely? What would change if we had an answer to the top open questions in Decision Theory?