I understood that there isn’t something to link to yet, based on this from the shortcomings section:
Concrete output: While we are fairly happy with the research progress, we think this insufficiently translated into communicable research output within the timeframe of the fellowship. Accordingly, we believe that a, if not “the”, main dimension of improvement for the fellowship lies in providing more structural support encouraging more and faster communicable output to capture the research/epistemic progress that has been generated.
I understood that there isn’t something to link to yet, based on this from the shortcomings section: