This doesnāt answer your question, but: Iāve heard several people opine that āfiscal sponsorshipā is a really bad name for what it entails. I work at Epoch, which is a fiscal sponsee of Rethink Priorities (and yes, RP uses the word āsponseeā for us and all their sponsees). My understanding is that we (Epoch) pay some kind of fee to RP (annual? maybe a percentage of our budget? idk), and in return, RPās HR people handle our HR stuff and some of their ops people spend some time doing ops work for us. This is almost the complete opposite of being āfiscally sponsoredā in the sense of being sponsored by and receiving money from the sponsor.
Hey Robi! Yeah, I agree fiscal sponsorship can be a misleading term, since āsponsorā suggests someone who provides money. In the case of fiscal sponsorship, what the sponsor provides is tax-exempt status. Iād be somewhat reticent to use another term because this one is widely used in the nonprofit world. From Wikipedia:
Fiscal sponsorship refers to the practice of non-profit organizations offering their legal and tax-exempt status to groups (...). It typically involves a fee-based contractual arrangement between a project and an established non-profit.
I do think the EA community could use a bit more clarity around what fiscal sponsorship is, though. Maybe us at RP will write some posts about this soon.
I should note also that fiscal sponsors often donāt provide operational support, as RP does for Epoch and other fiscally sponsored projects. So thatās not what the term āfiscal sponsorshipā primarily refers to. Outside of EA, I think itās more commonly just a way for non-profit projects to accept tax-exempt donations.
This doesnāt answer your question, but: Iāve heard several people opine that āfiscal sponsorshipā is a really bad name for what it entails. I work at Epoch, which is a fiscal sponsee of Rethink Priorities (and yes, RP uses the word āsponseeā for us and all their sponsees). My understanding is that we (Epoch) pay some kind of fee to RP (annual? maybe a percentage of our budget? idk), and in return, RPās HR people handle our HR stuff and some of their ops people spend some time doing ops work for us. This is almost the complete opposite of being āfiscally sponsoredā in the sense of being sponsored by and receiving money from the sponsor.
h/āt @SarahPomeranz
Hey Robi! Yeah, I agree fiscal sponsorship can be a misleading term, since āsponsorā suggests someone who provides money. In the case of fiscal sponsorship, what the sponsor provides is tax-exempt status. Iād be somewhat reticent to use another term because this one is widely used in the nonprofit world. From Wikipedia:
I do think the EA community could use a bit more clarity around what fiscal sponsorship is, though. Maybe us at RP will write some posts about this soon.
I should note also that fiscal sponsors often donāt provide operational support, as RP does for Epoch and other fiscally sponsored projects. So thatās not what the term āfiscal sponsorshipā primarily refers to. Outside of EA, I think itās more commonly just a way for non-profit projects to accept tax-exempt donations.
Thank you for your comment.
Yes, just want to confirm the costs involved:
CEās handbook page 350 estimates costs as well:
Couple reasons why the cost could be worth it is: