In this sequence Milan Griffes explains the concept of “consequentialist cluelessness” and its implications for effective altruism. Is it possible that we don’t have a clue about the overall net impact of our actions? When we think about the consequences of our actions, how do we determine what consequences we should consider?
The first post describes cluelessness & its relevance to EA; arguing that for many popular EA interventions we don’t have a clue about the intervention’s overall net impact.
The second post considers a potential reply to concerns about cluelessness.
The third post examines how tractable cluelessness is – to what extent we can grow more clueful about an intervention through intentional effort?
The fourth post discusses how we might do good while being clueless to an important extent.