RSS

Dooms­day argument

TagLast edit: 23 May 2022 10:23 UTC by Leo

The doomsday argument is the argument that the human species will soon go extinct, because otherwise the present generation of humans will be among the first to ever live, which is antecedently very improbable.

Further reading

Bostrom, Nick (2008) The doomsday argument, Think, vol. 6, pp. 23–28.

Bostrom, Nick (2016) What is the doomsday argument?, Closer to Truth, October 3.

Gott, J. Richard (1993) Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects, Nature, vol. 363, pp. 315–319.

Leslie, John (1996) The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction, London: Routledge.

Poundstone, William (2019) The Doomsday Calculation: How an Equation That Predicts the Future Is Transforming Everything We Know about Life and the Universe, New York: Little, Brown Spark.

Richmond, Alasdair (2006) The doomsday argument, Philosophical Books, vol. 47, pp. 129–142.

[Question] What do you make of the dooms­day ar­gu­ment?

niklas19 Mar 2021 6:30 UTC
14 points
8 comments1 min readEA link

In fa­vor of more an­throp­ics research

Eric Neyman15 Aug 2021 17:33 UTC
21 points
7 comments1 min readEA link

New Global Pri­ori­ties In­sti­tute work­ing pa­pers—and an up­dated ver­sion of “The case for strong longter­mism”

Global Priorities Institute9 Aug 2021 16:57 UTC
46 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Dooms­day rings twice

Global Priorities Institute31 Aug 2019 13:54 UTC
3 points
0 comments2 min readEA link
(globalprioritiesinstitute.org)

Dooms­day and ob­jec­tive chance

Global Priorities Institute30 Jun 2021 13:14 UTC
3 points
0 comments2 min readEA link
(globalprioritiesinstitute.org)

A Pin and a Bal­loon: An­thropic Frag­ility In­creases Chances of Ru­n­away Global Warm­ing

turchin11 Sep 2022 10:22 UTC
33 points
25 comments52 min readEA link
No comments.