The main point you miss is that the main goal of all this is to get a better negotiation position on Earth with our own superintelligence (and there are high chances that it will be soon and misaligned)- which at early stages will also very uncertain about aliens detraction in the universe. It is like crying into an open window—“a guy, Jack, is in my room and is going to kill me!” You don’t know if there is police outside—but you hope to affect Jack’s calculus.
turchin
Karma: 659
Warning Aliens About the Dangerous AI We Might Create
Mess AI – deliberate corruption of the training data to prevent superintelligence
Between 1 and 10 years - likely 3
After it crosses Saturn orbit, it will take 5.25 years to get to the Sun. Unlikely it will be observed before crossing Saturn orbit as there is no constant monitoring there and it is very dim there.
Quantum immortality and AI risk – the fate of a lonely survivor
A New Global Risk: Large Comet’s Impact on Sun Could Cause Fires on Earth
I am working on sideloding – creating mind models via LLM—which allows performing different experiments including the ones about the ethics of uploading. Will it be interested to you? More: https://github.com/avturchin/minduploading/
if it is first and knows that it will kill all others
One thing about DA is that I have to know that I am selected randmoly from the group of observers. A first AI will know that it is the first, so there is no randomness.
If there are many AIs, then there is no singleton and opinion of each is not important.
Also I think that DA and anthropics is solvable and the most of assumptions are true but in slightly different situations: they answer different questions.
However, such full anthropic solution require a lot of cognitive work to map full anthropic landscape. An AI may use some conservative approach before it is solved adding weights to different solutions.
Of course, I meant not Bronze age collapse, but known plethora of existential risks. But your argument that others will outcompete us is valid—unless the totality of x-risks is a universal Great Filter.
Universe will choose the simplest way to stop time travel. It doesn’t care is it the destruction of a civilization or some mysterious way to prevent changes in the past. Moreover, as civilizations naturally have a tendency to fall and this prevents all time machines, then civilization destruction is easier way to prevent time travel.
If a non-cancel principle is false, then causality should move along a timeline twice. First normally, and second time—when the time line is canceled. The interesting question arises: can the canceling wave reach the normal wave and if yes, when? (the answer must be “yes” because if it never reaches the now moment, the canceling never happens). For example, if cancel wave has finite but high speed, it will reach us just before we were going to start the time machine.
From anthropic considerations, we can say that we will take this precommitment and will follow it.
Let’s assume that time travel becomes possible when an advance civilization reach a rotating black hole, as it follows from general relativity.
However, non-cancel principle is valid and can’t be fulfilled by new timeline creation. (That is, equal to Novikov’s principle).
In that case, the only way to prevent timeline collapse is to prevent civilizations to achieve blackholes!
In that case, the universe should be organized in the way which prevents large scale civilizations and space travel. This solves Fermi paradox and really terrifying to us.
However, if we precomit never come close to black holes, we can escape the “curse”!
Time Machine as Existential Risk
Quantum Immortality: A Perspective if AI Doomers are Probably Right
I found it rather difficult to download it from any of the listed sources, except amazon kindly web where formatting is not good for reading. Can you just upload a pdf somewhere?
Maybe better say ‘zoo’ vs ‘forest’, or ‘very well protected area’ vs ‘partly protected area’.
If there is only a few habited planets inside grabby alien sphere, they will be very valuable and very well protected so no UFOs will be observed.If there are millions of them, they are less valuable and thus less protected and therefore can be used for some practical activity, like turism, hunting or mining unobtanium. Obviously, if UFOs are aliens, local alien authorities let them be visible sometimes, so local aliens laws are not very strict.
Observation selection effects like SIA favors the hypothesis that there millions habitable planets inside any grabby aliens.
I think that your model is correct and ‘anthropically’ supported.
In some sense it favors ’zoo hypothesis”. However, there is an important distinction: is it zoo or natural reserve. In general, on Earth zoos are rare but well kept and natural reserves are more abundant, but less controlled. The same anthropic considerations which favor silent rulers, favor natural reserves vs zoos.
This has bad consequences for us: natural reserves are more likely to be visited by unauthorized visitors and poachers. Or if we will be less anthrophomorphisng, they have less value for cosmic rulers as they are more numerous. UFOs observations and their alleged connections with cattle mutilations and abductions are more favoring the idea that Earth is less protected hunting ground than well protected zoo.
Speaking about “unobservable” part. Aliens which consist of fields or using something like “5-th” dimension to travel will have much less visible footprint but will have much large sphere which they can grab, as they can travel with almost light speed. The same anthropic considerations favor such aliens as they will have larger sphere of influence. Observations of UFOs also imply that they use some non-typical for us way of propulsion, like instant acceleration, manipulating gravity and moving through objects.In other words, if aliens are not interesting in building Dyson spheres and can travel with near-light speed without leaving visible traces, we will see much less signs of their activity. Maybe they are more interested in controlling space than in performing a lot of computations.
The conclusion is unpleasant: we are typical and neglected planet which sometimes is abused by our mostly invisible rulers. But it is the same as life situation of most people on Earth.
I think that UFOs are really a wildcard in x-risk research.
1.Even if UFOs don’t have any serious substance behind them, the fact that many serious military people and even presidents believed in them, should update our prior about human irrationality and therefore increase our expectation that nuclear risks and AI risks will be mismanaged.2.If UFOs have an interesting, but not world-model-shattering explanation, e.g. they are a form of ball lightings, this opens a possibility of creating new weapons after their nature will be learned.
3. If their explanation is world-model-shattering, all our expectations about x-risks are wrong.
World-model-shattering explanations are not only classical aliens.They can be:
-glitches and viruses in the matrix;-space-faring animals consisting from exotic fields;
-clouds of nanobots from already extinct civilizations.
-malfunctioning berserks-robots
-elaborated lies from cold war era similar to other memetic mind attacks like “red mercury” or number radio stations.
That is why we can target Andromeda—the distance is good enough so they didn’t arrive yet and we can focus on many stars simultaneously and hope that aliens have very large receivers - maybe Dyson sphere-size. Also the main point is to affect local superintelliegce expected utility.