RSS

Frag­ile world hy­poth­e­sis/​polycrises

TagLast edit: 11 Mar 2024 6:44 UTC by Arepo

The fragile world hypothesis is the hypothesis that ‘if technological development continues indefinitely, systemic fragility will increase to the point that the possibility of a shock sufficient for complete collapse approaches certainty.’[1]

Closely related to the concept of a ‘global polycrisis’:

Established concepts, such as “systemic risk” (Renn 2016; Renn et al. 2019), “catastrophic risk” (Bostrom and Ćirković 2008), or “existential risk” (Ord 2020) do not adequately highlight these crisis interactions, even though they do capture essential aspects of the phenomenon …

A global polycrisis occurs when crises in multiple global systems become causally entangled in ways that significantly degrade humanity’s prospects. These interacting crises produce harms greater than the sum of those the crises would produce in isolation, were their host systems not so deeply interconnected.[2]

An earlier version of the same paper[3] described a global polycrisis as having three or more ‘systems of origin’ and involving ‘Irreversible and catastrophic degradation of humanity’s prospects’.

A weaker version of this hypothesis is that such a collapse isn’t inevitable, but is potentially as great an area of concern for longtermists as extinction, due to the ‘at a minimum, very difficult’ nature of even a single technological reboot[4] combined with the possibility of an increasingly difficult series of collapses and recoveries[5], and/​or due to the possibility of a collapsed-and-rebuilt society having much less benign values than our own.[6]

The Seshat Databank is a repository of data used to predict possible paths to societal collapse.

Not to be confused with the vulnerable world hypothesis.

Further reading

Baum, Seth, Timothy M. Maher Jr. & Jacob Haqq-Misra (2013 Double Catastrophe: Intermittent Stratospheric Geoengineering Induced By Societal Collapse, Environment, Systems and Decisions, vol. 33, pp. 168-180

Bologna, Mauro & Gerardo Aquino (2020), Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis, Nature.

Brozović, Danilo (2023), Societal collapse: A literature review, Futures vol. 145.

Jebari, Karim (2019), Civilization Re-Emerging After a Catastrophic Collapse, EAGx Nordic presentation

Lawrence, Michael, Thomas Homer-Dixon, Scott Janzwood, Johan Rockstöm, Ortwin Renn & Jonathan F. Donges (2024) Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement, Global Sustainability vol. 7

Lynas, Mark, Probabilities of worst case scenarios, 80 000 Hours podcast

Mokyr, Joel (2000) King Kong and Cold Fusion: Counterfactual analysis and the History of Technology, in P. E. Tetlock, R. N. Lebow, & G. Parker (Eds.), Unmaking the West: ‘What-if?’ Scenarios that rewrite World History (pp. 277-322). University of Michigan Press.

Turchin, Alexey et al (2022) A Pin and a Balloon: Anthropic Fragility Increases Chances of Runaway Global Warming, Effective Altruism Forum

  1. ^
  2. ^

    Lawrence, Michael, Scott Janzwood & Thomas Homer-Dixon (2022) What Is a Global Polycrisis? And how is it different from a systemic risk? (version 2.0), published by the Cascade Institute

  3. ^

    Lawrence, Michael, Scott Janzwood & Thomas Homer-Dixon (2022) What Is a Global Polycrisis? And how is it different from a systemic risk? (version 1.1), published by the Cascade Institute

  4. ^

    Dartnell, Louis (2015) Out of the ashes, Aeon.

  5. ^

    Maher, Timothy M. Jr. & Seth Baum Adaptation to and Recovery from Global Catastrophe, Sustainability, vol. 5, pp. 1461-1479

  6. ^

The great en­ergy de­scent (short ver­sion) - An im­por­tant thing EA might have missed

CB🔸31 Aug 2022 21:50 UTC
61 points
90 comments10 min readEA link

RESILIENCER Work­shop Re­port on So­lar Ra­di­a­tion Mod­ifi­ca­tion Re­search and Ex­is­ten­tial Risk Released

Gideon Futerman3 Feb 2023 18:58 UTC
24 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

Longter­mist (es­pe­cially x-risk) ter­minol­ogy has bi­as­ing assumptions

Arepo30 Oct 2022 16:26 UTC
70 points
13 comments7 min readEA link

An en­tire cat­e­gory of risks is un­der­val­ued by EA [Sum­mary of pre­vi­ous fo­rum post]

Richard R5 Sep 2022 15:07 UTC
76 points
5 comments5 min readEA link

Beyond Sim­ple Ex­is­ten­tial Risk: Sur­vival in a Com­plex In­ter­con­nected World

Gideon Futerman21 Nov 2022 14:35 UTC
84 points
67 comments21 min readEA link

Model­ling civil­i­sa­tion be­yond a catastrophe

Arepo30 Oct 2022 16:26 UTC
58 points
5 comments13 min readEA link

Sys­temic Cas­cad­ing Risks: Rele­vance in Longter­mism & Value Lock-In

Richard R2 Sep 2022 7:53 UTC
56 points
10 comments16 min readEA link

The great en­ergy de­scent—Part 1: Can re­new­ables re­place fos­sil fuels?

CB🔸31 Aug 2022 21:51 UTC
44 points
2 comments22 min readEA link

The great en­ergy de­scent—Part 2: Limits to growth and why we prob­a­bly won’t reach the stars

CB🔸31 Aug 2022 21:51 UTC
19 points
0 comments25 min readEA link

The great en­ergy de­scent—Post 3: What we can do, what we can’t do

CB🔸31 Aug 2022 21:51 UTC
17 points
3 comments22 min readEA link

Two tools for re­think­ing ex­is­ten­tial risk

Arepo5 Apr 2024 21:25 UTC
82 points
14 comments25 min readEA link
No comments.