RSS

In­ter­per­sonal com­par­i­sons of wellbeing

TagLast edit: 26 Mar 2022 19:05 UTC by Pablo

Interpersonal comparisons of wellbeing (also called interpersonal comparisons of utility) are comparisons involving the welfare levels of different people. Such comparisons are often presupposed in evaluations of social outcomes and in explanations of human behavior.

Further reading

D’Aspremont, Claude (2008) Interpersonal utility comparisons (new developments), in Steven N. Durlauf & Lawrence E. Blume (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed., London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3250–3254.

Elster, Jon & John E. Roemer (eds.) (1991) Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greaves, Hilary & Harvey Lederman (2018) Extended preferences and interpersonal comparisons of well-being, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 96, pp. 636–667.

Harsanyi, John C. (1980) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, in Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 6–23.

Ng, Yew-Kwang (2013) Interpersonal utility, in James E. Crimmins (ed.) The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 279–280.

Related entries

utilitarianism | welfare economics | wellbeing

In­creas­ingly vague in­ter­per­sonal welfare comparisons

Michael St Jules 🔸1 Feb 2024 6:12 UTC
36 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Why I’m suss on wellbe­ing surveys

Henry Howard🔸18 Mar 2023 7:07 UTC
9 points
15 comments2 min readEA link

[Question] Is any­one here a philoso­pher or economist work­ing on the in­ter­per­sonal com­par­i­son prob­lem?

Philosophy Bear14 Jan 2023 7:07 UTC
18 points
7 comments1 min readEA link

Types of sub­jec­tive welfare

Michael St Jules 🔸2 Feb 2024 9:56 UTC
42 points
0 comments18 min readEA link

Ex­pe­rience size

trammell7 Oct 2024 21:43 UTC
122 points
21 comments20 min readEA link

Other-cen­tered ethics and Harsanyi’s Ag­gre­ga­tion Theorem

Holden Karnofsky2 Feb 2022 3:21 UTC
59 points
11 comments72 min readEA link

Solu­tion to the two en­velopes prob­lem for moral weights

Michael St Jules 🔸19 Feb 2024 0:15 UTC
71 points
26 comments27 min readEA link

Se­quence overview: Welfare and moral weights

Michael St Jules 🔸1 Aug 2024 16:51 UTC
34 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

An­i­mals mat­ter a lot on non-he­do­nis­tic views

Michael St Jules 🔸16 Oct 2024 18:15 UTC
52 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

Some solu­tions to util­i­tar­ian problems

Stijn Bruers 🔸14 Jul 2019 10:04 UTC
4 points
5 comments1 min readEA link

Gra­da­tions of moral weight

Michael St Jules 🔸29 Feb 2024 23:08 UTC
14 points
0 comments10 min readEA link

Th­e­sis Sum­mary and Open Ques­tions: Nor­ma­tive Uncer­tainty and In­for­ma­tion Value

rileyharris27 Apr 2022 8:46 UTC
32 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

About ‘sub­jec­tive’ wellbe­ing and cost-effec­tive­ness anal­y­sis in men­tal health

LondonGal30 Jul 2023 13:39 UTC
78 points
14 comments41 min readEA link

Zero Utils: why util­ity wants to be additive

Ja3k14 Jan 2023 16:29 UTC
6 points
3 comments8 min readEA link
(ja3k.com)
No comments.