RSS

In­ter­per­sonal com­par­i­sons of wellbeing

TagLast edit: 26 Mar 2022 19:05 UTC by Pablo

Interpersonal comparisons of wellbeing (also called interpersonal comparisons of utility) are comparisons involving the welfare levels of different people. Such comparisons are often presupposed in evaluations of social outcomes and in explanations of human behavior.

Further reading

D’Aspremont, Claude (2008) Interpersonal utility comparisons (new developments), in Steven N. Durlauf & Lawrence E. Blume (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed., London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3250–3254.

Elster, Jon & John E. Roemer (eds.) (1991) Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greaves, Hilary & Harvey Lederman (2018) Extended preferences and interpersonal comparisons of well-being, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 96, pp. 636–667.

Harsanyi, John C. (1980) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility, in Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 6–23.

Ng, Yew-Kwang (2013) Interpersonal utility, in James E. Crimmins (ed.) The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 279–280.

Related entries

utilitarianism | welfare economics | wellbeing

In­creas­ingly vague in­ter­per­sonal welfare comparisons

MichaelStJules1 Feb 2024 6:12 UTC
36 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Why I’m suss on wellbe­ing surveys

Henry Howard🔸18 Mar 2023 7:07 UTC
9 points
15 comments2 min readEA link

[Question] Is any­one here a philoso­pher or economist work­ing on the in­ter­per­sonal com­par­i­son prob­lem?

Philosophy Bear14 Jan 2023 7:07 UTC
18 points
7 comments1 min readEA link

An­i­mals mat­ter a lot on non-he­do­nic views

MichaelStJules16 Oct 2024 18:15 UTC
40 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

Types of sub­jec­tive welfare

MichaelStJules2 Feb 2024 9:56 UTC
42 points
0 comments18 min readEA link

Other-cen­tered ethics and Harsanyi’s Ag­gre­ga­tion Theorem

Holden Karnofsky2 Feb 2022 3:21 UTC
59 points
11 comments72 min readEA link

Se­quence overview: Welfare and moral weights

MichaelStJules1 Aug 2024 16:51 UTC
34 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Ex­pe­rience size

trammell7 Oct 2024 21:43 UTC
97 points
12 comments20 min readEA link

Some solu­tions to util­i­tar­ian problems

Stijn14 Jul 2019 10:04 UTC
4 points
5 comments1 min readEA link

Solu­tion to the two en­velopes prob­lem for moral weights

MichaelStJules19 Feb 2024 0:15 UTC
64 points
26 comments27 min readEA link

Gra­da­tions of moral weight

MichaelStJules29 Feb 2024 23:08 UTC
13 points
0 comments10 min readEA link

Zero Utils: why util­ity wants to be additive

Ja3k14 Jan 2023 16:29 UTC
6 points
3 comments8 min readEA link
(ja3k.com)

Th­e­sis Sum­mary and Open Ques­tions: Nor­ma­tive Uncer­tainty and In­for­ma­tion Value

rileyharris27 Apr 2022 8:46 UTC
32 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

About ‘sub­jec­tive’ wellbe­ing and cost-effec­tive­ness anal­y­sis in men­tal health

LondonGal30 Jul 2023 13:39 UTC
74 points
14 comments41 min readEA link
No comments.