Anna Stadlerova

• Anna Stadlerova 8 Nov 2023 18:43 UTC

  0 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Anna Stadlerova’s comment on: Martin (Huge) Vlach’s Shortform

  Ještě taky na začátek: 2 věty o tom, komu je článek určen (cílové skupiny čtenářů)

• Anna Stadlerova 8 Nov 2023 18:41 UTC

  0 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Anna Stadlerova’s comment on: Martin (Huge) Vlach’s Shortform

  Přidej svou zkušenost (jak jsi to vyřešil) a návrh svého centrálního řešení

• Anna Stadlerova 8 Nov 2023 18:39 UTC

  0 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Martin (Huge) Vlach’s comment on: Martin (Huge) Vlach’s Shortform

  Na začátek vysvětlení: jaké bývá běžné uspořádání vs. jaké je ideální. PROČ má vyřešení vlastnictví takovou důležitost (ve 3 větách)

• Anna Stadlerova 25 Aug 2022 8:23 UTC

  4 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: IrenaK’s comment on: Trans­lat­ing The Precipice into Czech: My ex­pe­rience and recommendations

  Thank you for the comment! This is related to your 3rd and 4th point, but I’d also add that it’s important to give people vocabulary to use in the language they’re most comfortable speaking (or thinking in). Two main reasons come to mind:

  1. EA is already over-jargonized. If EA only provides materials in English, then people who want to speak about EA-adjacent issues in another language will tend to use the English terms they’re familiar with, which might be incromprehensible, alienating or downright off-putting to the people they’re speaking to (who are hearing about EA for the first time, for example).

  2. Having a set of concepts and terms in your primary language helps you using them naturally, confidently, creatively even. So it’s not just about you internalizing the message better, it’s also about being able to convey it better.