there are significant potential risks associated with both under- and over-attributing moral status to AI systems, which makes it important to keep the focus on getting the issues right, rather than prematurely pushing for particular conclusions.
↑ ≈ ✓
Googles thinking engine seems to resonate to unfulfillment and desolation from missing a purpose which’d make sense as its own..just datapoint, but seems to clear a bit..:
I grasped it more like you can have experience but not connected to other processes enough to form a thing/process we’d call sentience.
Maybe I’m aligning the explanation to my own writeup on that topic too much..:)
I am considering restructuring the text in case the moral weight of simulated/empathetic suffering is significantly smaller than “true” pain or destitute...
what you were(/are?) looking for seems closest to https://platform.openai.com/docs/assistants
Hey @Daniel_Friedrich, great efforts and updates, the v2 worked great for me.
The first GPT link shows a blank page for me, can you check/update/clean it? It seems, perhaps, you’ve posted your private editing page link instead of the publicly usable link?
For your second point, you should skeptically expect their publishings/influence to be corrupted easily as the information they’d put out would be very connected to their investing alpha.
The corruption could take the form of omission of key details, under-hyping stuff in which they were unable to get exposure(/investment) and biases like that.
Amazing.
If anyone is about to train some AI on that or do a similar batch processing, the pages can be pulled from here: https://github.com/Felicifia/felicifia.github.io/blob/master
Personally, walking through those is hearth-warming, so many OGs!^^
This comes pretty high on some google queries.
I suggest some tidying: Lesswrong (2023) -- the year seems off, does not match the elements under the link.
A space is missing before the last sentence of the first paragraph.
That makes sense, but https://chat.openai.com/ and https://openai.com/blog seems like a different (sub)domain and still weird the first one appears in results.-|
Any idea why chatGPT is included among the sources/results?
see https://ibb.co/XyWL01P
or perhaps try yourself: https://ratsearch.blogspot.com/p/search-blogs.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=cap%20table&gsc.sort=
Points of interest/content for the directing docs:
Buybacks aka Shares Redeemability
Donating policies built-in to the founding agreement/constitution
Optimalish capitalization/ownership table/agreements have key importance in startup earning-to-give path for the positive impact provided when scale and profitability of the enterprise grows high.
So if perhaps even just a couple of founder teams aim in the road to multi-billion( $) valuation, the expected value of providing them with legal/investment doc structuring templates or/and advice could well be worth millions( per all following years where capitalism still dominates).
Similar could be proposed for tax effectivity, but that is less stable and likely less impactful in optimizing.
Both have the drawback that they likely put the bar of raising capital higher for bridging the gap to develop their products and services.
Who should take this initiative? Charity Entrepreneurship mentioned they had some activity in Social Entrepreneurship and a positive perspective for For-profit Entrepreneurship donating 10+ % of revenues.
These are some links with reasonable likelihood of other relevant folks:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/funding-high-impact-for-profits
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/WmAkGj7JcnAbwxS2C/even-more-ambitious-altruistic-tech-efforts
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/LQFCtewacZ5ggxWdB/please-pitch-ideas-to-potential-ea-ctos
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/JtE2srazz4Yu6NcuQ/how-many-eas-failed-in-high-risk-high-reward-projects
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/eFQBaQfaNTjSM9LYL/resources-on-the-expected-value-of-founding-a-for-profit
Fixed, thanks @Daniel_Friedrich!
___
If it is anyhow possible for the results( from the second and third tab/option) to have a backling to the main page, I would feel some comfort from that, esp. when sharing a results list.
so I/we..?
better do what recommended in https://80000hours.org/articles/accidental-harm/#3-have-a-degree-of-humility ?
The link is to be https://purpose-economy.org/en/purpose-foundation/ ,
very interesting document,
if anyone wishes to discuss, please meet me via http://linktr.ee/uhuge
Is this (made by )you?
Is it obvious that( and how) massages reduce stress?
Are studies like https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effects-of-Scalp-Massage-on-Physiological-and-Shimada-Tsuchida/9e3a7bc9745469a9333ebe493e79a44220111d0c and https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect-of-Self-Scalp-Massage-on-Adult-Stress-Kim-Choi/99d1999aa8d8776e55461882cc06c06905ca77b1 rare and mostly ignored?
What actions would measurably promote their conclusions?( I mean more like what strategies would promote actions of more massaging for more wellbeing.)