Global Priorities Institute

The Sig­nifi­cance, Per­sis­tence, Contin­gency Frame­work (William MacAskill, Teruji Thomas and Aron Val­lin­der)

Paper sum­mary: The Epistemic Challenge to Longter­mism (Chris­tian Tarsney)

• Global Priorities InstituteJul 21, 2022, 3:45 PM

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Will Aldred’s comment on: Paper sum­mary: Stak­ing our fu­ture: de­on­tic long-ter­mism and the non-iden­tity prob­lem (An­dreas Mo­gensen)

  Thanks for letting us know, this should be corrected now.

Paper sum­mary: A Para­dox for Tiny Prob­a­bil­ities and Enor­mous Values (Nick Beck­stead and Teruji Thomas)

• Global Priorities InstituteJun 14, 2022, 4:56 PM

  4 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Ramiro’s comment on: Paper sum­mary: Stak­ing our fu­ture: de­on­tic long-ter­mism and the non-iden­tity prob­lem (An­dreas Mo­gensen)

  We’d be supportive of translations of the working paper summaries being created, but we currently don’t have the capacity to organise this ourselves. If there are people who’d like to work on this, feel free to get in touch. (@Pablo: We’ll reach out to you.)

Paper sum­mary: Stak­ing our fu­ture: de­on­tic long-ter­mism and the non-iden­tity prob­lem (An­dreas Mo­gensen)

Paper sum­mary: Mo­ral de­mands and the far fu­ture (An­dreas Mo­gensen)

Paper sum­mary: The case for strong longter­mism (Hilary Greaves and William MacAskill)

Work­shop for un­der­rep­re­sented groups in GPR—In­tel­lec­tual and cul­tural di­ver­sity in GPR

• Global Priorities InstituteJan 31, 2022, 1:20 PM

  4 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Jack Cunningham’s comment on: Up­date on GPI’s ac­tivi­ties and plans for 2022

  Even though this is a bit outdated now, the first 10 minutes of this talk at EAG 2018 give a good overview of GPI’s high-level theory of change.

Up­date on GPI’s ac­tivi­ties and plans for 2022

Si­mu­la­tion ex­pec­ta­tion (Thomas, 2021)

Mo­ral un­cer­tainty and pub­lic jus­tifi­ca­tion (Bar­ret and Sch­midt, 2021)

New Global Pri­ori­ties In­sti­tute work­ing pa­pers—and an up­dated ver­sion of “The case for strong longter­mism”

Dy­namic Public Good Pro­vi­sion un­der Time Prefer­ence Hetero­gene­ity: The­ory and Ap­pli­ca­tions to Philanthropy

Cal­ibra­tion dilem­mas in the ethics of distribution

A Para­dox for Tiny Prob­a­bil­ities and Enor­mous Values

Dooms­day and ob­jec­tive chance

The scope of longtermism

Do not go gen­tle: why the Asym­me­try does not sup­port anti-natalism