Why shouldn’t one be a moral satisficer? I’m a satisficer in most things. I’d do better on the piano if I practiced longer and more regularly, but I’m happy with late intermediate/early advanced, etc. And I’m satisfied with the results of my satisficing in most things. And I’m satisfied with roughly a B- goodness rating—which given grade inflation is about average. Why should being being moral be any different from working at the piano or anything else in this regard? Or do you agree that moral satisficing is satisfactory?
Why shouldn’t one be a moral satisficer? I’m a satisficer in most things. I’d do better on the piano if I practiced longer and more regularly, but I’m happy with late intermediate/early advanced, etc. And I’m satisfied with the results of my satisficing in most things. And I’m satisfied with roughly a B- goodness rating—which given grade inflation is about average. Why should being being moral be any different from working at the piano or anything else in this regard? Or do you agree that moral satisficing is satisfactory?