It is possible to rationally prioritise between causes without engaging deeply on philosophical issues
I don’t think basic cost/benefit analysis requires enormous engagement with philosophy. People do it off the cuff all the time—just need to introduce them to the idea in the charitable context.
I’m thinking of it similar to basic econ: people don’t need to know a lot of price theory to be able to generally optimize their consumption.
I don’t think basic cost/benefit analysis requires enormous engagement with philosophy. People do it off the cuff all the time—just need to introduce them to the idea in the charitable context.
I’m thinking of it similar to basic econ: people don’t need to know a lot of price theory to be able to generally optimize their consumption.