mativazquez

• mativazquez 25 Feb 2021 23:55 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Eze Paez’s comment on: AMA: Lewis Bol­lard, Open Philanthropy

  this is really serious

• mativazquez 25 Feb 2021 23:50 UTC

  14 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Daniela Waldhorn’s comment on: AMA: Lewis Bol­lard, Open Philanthropy

  I know testimonies of people in the animal rights movement who have suffered the same thing you are talking about here, this is worrying and obviously it is not an isolated case.

• mativazquez 7 Apr 2020 16:55 UTC

  8 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Coron­avirus and non-hu­mans: How is the pan­demic af­fect­ing an­i­mals used for hu­man con­sump­tion?

  Thanks Daniela for this article, amazing work!

• mativazquez 14 Dec 2019 13:58 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Marcus_A_Davis’s comment on: We’re Re­think Pri­ori­ties. AMA.

  Thanks a lot, Marcus.

• mativazquez 12 Dec 2019 18:34 UTC

  7 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: We’re Re­think Pri­ori­ties. AMA.

  Which are the internal politics to promote diversity and non-discrimination?

• mativazquez 12 Dec 2019 16:59 UTC

  4 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Ben_West🔸’s comment on: In­tro­duc­ing Good Poli­cies: A new char­ity pro­mot­ing be­havi­our change interventions

  You can access here:

  https://​​www.rnl.caltech.edu/​​publications/​​pdf/​​aer04addiction.pdf

• mativazquez 21 Nov 2019 1:08 UTC

  5 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Next Steps in In­ver­te­brate Welfare, Part 2: Pos­si­ble Interventions

  increíble trabajo, muchísimas gracias por tanta dedicación en estos artículos.

  Amazing work, thank you very much for your dedication in these articles

• mativazquez 14 Jun 2019 22:48 UTC

  13 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: In­ver­te­brate Sen­tience: Sum­mary of find­ings, Part 1

  Thanks for this amazing work

  What links here?

  • Opinion: Es­ti­mat­ing In­ver­te­brate Sentience by Jason Schukraft (7 Nov 2019 2:38 UTC; 134 points)