What do you do when direct utilitarian computations give unintuitive results, for example if direct utilitarian math said that you should give 80% of the fund to just shrimp welfare? Is your methodology basically just to rank grant opportunities by utilitarian effectiveness (using best guesses) or do you have minimum percentages per species, or have allocation percentages for measurable interventions vs new/experimental interventions, or other ways of allocating?
I love the EA Animal Welfare Fund, thanks for your work!
I’m so glad people are working on this!
+1, I’d also consider funding SFF but I’d want to first know EA Animal Welfare fund’s opinion (and why EA Animal Welfare fund isn’t funding it).