Sam Bankman-Fried

• Sam Bankman-Fried 9 May 2022 6:50 UTC

  43 points

  0 ∶ 1

  on: An up­date in fa­vor of try­ing to make tens of billions of dollars

  FWIW I think this post is basically correct and also does a really great job of correctly strongly updating on very few data points—something which is tricky to do right but I think extremely important!

• Sam Bankman-Fried 10 May 2022 3:01 UTC

  150 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Some clar­ifi­ca­tions on the Fu­ture Fund’s ap­proach to grantmaking

  FWIW:
  
  1) agree with everything Nick said
  2) I am really proud of what the team has done on net, although obviously nothing’s perfect!
  3) We really do love feedback! If you have some on a specific grant we made you can submit here, or feel free to separately ping me/​Nick/​etc. :)

• Sam Bankman-Fried 10 May 2022 5:57 UTC

  46 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Peter Wildeford’s comment on: Some clar­ifi­ca­tions on the Fu­ture Fund’s ap­proach to grantmaking

  Totally agreed!
  
  although, to be frank, it does make me a bit confused where some of the consternation about specific, unspecified grants has come from...

• Sam Bankman-Fried 10 May 2022 18:04 UTC

  51 points

  0 ∶ 0

  in reply to: Nick_Beckstead’s comment on: Some clar­ifi­ca­tions on the Fu­ture Fund’s ap­proach to grantmaking

  Agree with this—it’s impossible to give constructive feedback on thousands of applications. The decision is between not giving grants, or accepting that most grant applications won’t get much feedback from us. We chose the latter.

• Sam Bankman-Fried 17 May 2022 0:49 UTC

  26 points

  0 ∶ 0

  on: Or­ga­ni­za­tional alignment

  100% agree

• [ ]

  [deleted]