While trying not to be ungenerous, this new post of “EA not funding country” aspect seems to fit into the above schema, whose goal seems to be drawing attention to their rejection (or relitigating it outright).
It’s bad if the post series of the OP is mischaracterizing these events, which I think is happening in the case of the grantmaker and now in this post about EA and countries.
I also don’t think it is good to say “Founder of EA <Country/Region/City>”, unless this is a claim for unusual/special activity or accomplishments that is distinct from normal community building.
The OP has posted multiple times in the past about their unsuccessful attempts to get EAIF funding.
Their EAIF application directly
Their fellowship program.
Their blog posts.
Some sort of clash with a grant maker (this seems bad in several ways).
While trying not to be ungenerous, this new post of “EA not funding country” aspect seems to fit into the above schema, whose goal seems to be drawing attention to their rejection (or relitigating it outright).
It’s bad if the post series of the OP is mischaracterizing these events, which I think is happening in the case of the grantmaker and now in this post about EA and countries.
I also don’t think it is good to say “Founder of EA <Country/Region/City>”, unless this is a claim for unusual/special activity or accomplishments that is distinct from normal community building.