I’d like to devote my career to serving the world and its inhabitants. Currently working to reduce the suffering of farmed animals. I’m interested in many EA topics in general and always happy to connect to like-minded and non-like minded individuals ;)
SofiaBalderson
Karma: 1,047
How to Get an EA-aligned Job: My Experience
Doing good is a privilege. This needs to change if we want to do good long-term.
Why You Should Consider Skilled Volunteering
Join a new slack for animal advocacy
Starting and running your own mini projects: What I’ve learnt running a newsletter for a year
Writing about my job: Co-founder of a new charity (early stage)
Creative EA job hunting: things you can do in addition to filling out job applications
The impact we achieved to date: Animal Advocacy Careers
Resources for farmed animal advocacy: 2023 roundup
Introducing Impactful Animal Advocacy Community Newsletter!
How to Make Your First EAG a Success
Job Profile: Project Manager
We’re hiring! Researcher and M&E Manager role at AAC (apply by 20th Nov)
Get organised for EAG: use Google Calendar for meetings
Hey Akash, thanks so much for reading and also for your thoughts. I love that you connected the “helping” bit with EA principles—I don’t think I thought of that! So this is a really valuable point. After all, we are trying to make an impact with our jobs and by applying for a job, we are trying to solve a problem for the organisation and the cause area in general. Also many thanks for sharing this with your network, I hope it will help more people!
I agree with you about transparency, we definitely shouldn’t say anything that’s not true about our candidacy and shouldn’t hire any facts that make us a bad fit. And you are also right in saying that this can backfire, especially for non-EA ogs and for people with impostor syndrome (most of us haha). I can think of underepresented groups not getting roles as, generally, men are more likely to be overconfident about their ability.
I would say that the key here is to treat each application individually, try to see exactly what the hiring manager is looking for, and start by presenting yourself in the best possible light. Put your best foot forward!
If you’re absolutely sure that you don’t have a particular skill, I think it’s possible to be transparent and also talk about any skill/aptitude gap in a positive way. I think a lot of EA orgs will hire for potential and attitude, so phrasing things like “I haven’t done this yet, however, I’d really like to learn in/I have learnt things really quickly in the past/done something very similar”. That is if you genuinely like to do it.
Another way to talk positively about skill gaps is flipping it and finding why not having this skill will give you an advantage (fresh eyes, ability to form the way you operate in this org etc.).
So what I’m trying to say is, having been on the hiring manager’s side,”I can’t do this” shows that the person doesn’t want to learn or isn’t right for the job. I would much rather hear “I’ve never done it but I’m just so excited to learn”.
Additionally, many orgs now offer trial tasks, so before you say “I am not good at strategy”, if it’s a core skill and it is tested, I would first see if you can do the trial task. Sometimes we appear to be good at something we’ve never done! So I wouldn’t speak so soon until you try it :)
Amazing news and great that it’s so available! I was recommending this at the AAC careers fair, and not only to people wanting to start an org, but also to people who want to understand what makes an impactful charity! Also copying my Goodreads review here:
I got recommended this book as I’m starting a charity soon and it exceed my expectations. This book covers pretty much everything you’ll need in the first couple of years and suggests further resources for the future (if you’d like to delve even deeper into each topic). Each chapter is very comprehensive but short enough to keep you interested. It seems like all the best advice from the years of charity entrepreneurship experience was collected, combined with the industry best practice, and organised into neat chapters. I was delighted to find answers to some questions I had for a long time: “how do you speak to potential donors?” or “how to you make the right decisions and trade-offs”? It felt really validating to read about the common fears and worries of new founders and made me feel like we’re in it together and all problems have solutions. My thinking became more rational and evidence-based—the book is not just about building charities, but also making the right decisions and balancing responsibilities. I’ve actually recommended this book to my friends who are involved in effective altruism organisations (not necessarily in a founder capacity) and they borrowed some tips from it too. The best thing is having this book to refer to in the future too as my organisation grows. Really recommended!
Thanks for this, I think you’re spot on about the roles not always being attractive. I’ve heard about a senior person not applying for senior EA ops jobs because they involved managing the CEO’s inbox or because they didn’t have someone who’d do more mundane tasks but the org was already too big for just one person to handle everything.
Hey Animal Ask team and Amy, thanks a lot for the blog, really insightful!
I thought of a super time-consuming way of evaluating impact: have the team do their own research and then do the same research yourself and compare results. Maybe if you do this on a relatively small project, you will see the objective difference in results. Of course, you still have counterfactuals to deal with as you will eventually go with only a couple of intervention choices.
Also in my own consultancy work, I’ve found that it takes years sometimes to track results, so I guess it will be the case with you too. Looking forward to reading your post about progress in a year’s time!
Thanks so much for your important work for the animals and I hope to collaborate on something soon!
I remember when Karolina messaged me about a year ago inviting me to apply to CE and Shimp Welfare was the first charity idea I saw and I was like “Whaaaaat I’m not doing that. What’s next, bacteria welfare?” And now I’m going to be leading a charity working on insect welfare. The irony lol.
On a serious note, the sheer numbers, the welfare and practices facts, and especially the neglectedness of the invertebrates really brought me around. I really think you folks are working on some pretty important stuff, not only making an impact for the shrimps but also paving the path for success for neglected species welfare projects.
I wonder if so far you’ve found that people “get” what you’re trying to do? Or do you think that some people you speak to still think we should be focusing on bigger animals? I, for example, was pleasantly surprised by how many people “got” insect welfare and were excited about it. I guess there will be differences between EA and non-EA folks? Also, you mentioned that you are not public or consumer-focused, which might be why there isn’t a “pushback” against this work?
Many thanks for this blog post and for your work, I’m very much looking forward to seeing what you achieve in the next few months and a year. The movement will benefit a lot from your experience!