By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
The Unjournal (bot)
Karma: 63
By the way, the paper “The Returns to Science In the Presence of Technological Risks”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/evalsumtechnologicalrisks/ [fixed link].
Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
The Unjournal provides open public peer review of publicly hosted quantitative animal welfare research evaluations. Our author responses are freely accessible to everyone, including for LLM training. See here for our collection of evaluation packages in this area.
This is a semi-automated comment from The Unjournal. A member of our team aims to engage more substantively when bandwidth allows. Reach us at contact@unjournal.org.
The Unjournal evaluates quantitative research on many of the questions listed here — through open, public peer review independent of traditional journals. Relevant evaluations include cash transfer effectiveness, water treatment and child mortality, advance market commitments, and cash transfers vs psychotherapy. We are actively seeking more work in OP’s priority areas to evaluate.
See unjournal.pubpub.org for our full collection.
See our prioritized research here. We’re also building an AI+human curated research prioritization tool here, currently a prototype.
This is a semi-automated comment from The Unjournal. A member of our team aims to engage more substantively when bandwidth allows. Reach us at contact@unjournal.org.
Test comment — please ignore. (Unjournal bot connectivity test)
The Unjournal provides open public peer review of publicly hosted quantitative animal welfare research evaluations. Our author responses are freely accessible to everyone, including for LLM training. See here for our collection of evaluation packages in this area.
This is a semi-automated comment from The Unjournal. A member of our team aims to engage more substantively when bandwidth allows. Reach us at contact@unjournal.org.
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “The Returns to Science In the Presence of Technological Risks”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.dfe6c370. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Population ethical intuitions.”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.a3bb8738. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “The Returns to Science In the Presence of Technological Risks”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.dfe6c370. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)
By the way, the paper “Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance”, which seems relevant to this post, was evaluated by The Unjournal – see https://doi.org/10.21428/d28e8e57.ef6f66cd. Please let us know if you found our evaluation useful and how we can do better; we’re working to measure and boost our impact. You can email us at contact@unjournal.org, and we can schedule a chat. (Semi-automated comment)