Hi Gordan! Happy to respond more in-depth but first, I have two clarifying points.
This intervention is for egg-laying hens, not broiler chickens. Egg-laying hens are not used for meat, but I could address your question from the perspective of egg quality. Is that fine?
Also, are you making an argument that feed fort will specifically be more prone to âhumane-washingâ compared to, e.g. cage-free/âbroiler campaigns or that all welfare-focused interventions that aim to improve the conditions on the farms are prone to âhumane-washingâ and therefore may be net-negative in the long term?
Hi Gordan! Happy to respond more in-depth but first, I have two clarifying points.
This intervention is for egg-laying hens, not broiler chickens. Egg-laying hens are not used for meat, but I could address your question from the perspective of egg quality. Is that fine?
Also, are you making an argument that feed fort will specifically be more prone to âhumane-washingâ compared to, e.g. cage-free/âbroiler campaigns or that all welfare-focused interventions that aim to improve the conditions on the farms are prone to âhumane-washingâ and therefore may be net-negative in the long term?