Hi Jonas, thanks for the comment. I’ll change the main text and accompanying footnote to make clear environmental benefits were not the main aim of the initiatives.
You should correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems to me that the proposals were eventually weakened to the point that conservation of resources became the primary (perhaps sole?) focus.
You should correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems to me that the proposals were eventually weakened to the point that conservation of resources became the primary (perhaps sole?) focus.
“Primary focus” seems correct. The resulting legal texts didn’t mention plant-based food anymore, if I recall correctly, but still led to a reduction in meat consumption/portions, so in that sense they were still somewhat successful.
Hi Jonas, thanks for the comment. I’ll change the main text and accompanying footnote to make clear environmental benefits were not the main aim of the initiatives.
You should correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems to me that the proposals were eventually weakened to the point that conservation of resources became the primary (perhaps sole?) focus.
“Primary focus” seems correct. The resulting legal texts didn’t mention plant-based food anymore, if I recall correctly, but still led to a reduction in meat consumption/portions, so in that sense they were still somewhat successful.